Hubungan Pemahaman Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dengan Sikap Etis Mahasiswa terhadap Konten Deepfake di Media Sosial
Abstract
Perkembangan deepfake memperluas persoalan ruang digital dari sekadar misinformasi menuju krisis autentisitas, manipulasi identitas, dan penurunan kepercayaan pada konten media. Dalam konteks tersebut, respons mahasiswa terhadap deepfake tidak cukup dijelaskan oleh kemampuan teknis mengenali konten sintetis, tetapi juga oleh kerangka etik yang digunakan untuk menilai, memverifikasi, dan merespons konten. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis hubungan pemahaman nilai-nilai Pancasila dengan sikap etis mahasiswa terhadap konten deepfake di media sosial. Penelitian menggunakan desain kuantitatif korelasional yang bersifat eksploratif dengan survei potong lintang. Data diperoleh dari 50 respons lengkap mahasiswa yang dikumpulkan secara daring pada 6-10 April 2026 melalui kuesioner Linier 1-5 yang terdiri atas 28 butir pada empat konstruk, yaitu pemahaman tentang deepfake, pemahaman nilai-nilai Pancasila, perilaku verifikasi informasi, dan sikap etis terhadap konten deepfake. Analisis meliputi statistik deskriptif, corrected item-total correlation, Cronbach’s alpha, korelasi Pearson dan Spearman, serta regresi linear sederhana untuk menggambarkan asosiasi linear. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa seluruh variabel berada pada kategori sangat tinggi; rerata tertinggi terdapat pada sikap etis terhadap deepfake (M = 4,498; SD = 0,201), diikuti pemahaman nilai-nilai Pancasila (M = 4,412; SD = 0,299). Pemahaman nilai-nilai Pancasila berhubungan positif dan signifikan dengan sikap etis mahasiswa terhadap deepfake (r = 0,573; p < 0,001; rho = 0,641; p < 0,001). Pada model linear sederhana, koefisien tetap positif (B = 0,386; R² = 0,329; p < 0,001; sig. HC3 = 0,018). Temuan ini menunjukkan adanya asosiasi positif awal antara pemahaman nilai-nilai Pancasila dan sikap etis mahasiswa terhadap deepfake, meskipun hasilnya perlu dibaca secara hati-hati karena instrumen self-report yang digunakan masih bersifat eksploratif.
References
Ahmed, S., Wei, A., Bee, T., Wei, S., & Ng, T. (2024). Social Media News Use Amplifies the Illusory Truth Effects of Viral Deepfakes: A Cross-National Study of Eight Countries. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 68(5), 778-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2024.2410783
Alanazi, S., Asif, S., & Caird, A. (2025). Unmasking deepfakes: a multidisciplinary examination of social impacts and regulatory responses. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 7(1), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-025-00060-4
Altuncu, E., Franqueira, V. N. L., & Li, S. (2024). Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review.
Boediman, E. P. (2025). Exploring the impact of deepfake technology on public trust and media manipulation: A scoping review. Komunikasi, 19. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol19.iss2.art8
Dhahir, D. F., Kenda, N., Dirgahayu, D., & Djaffar, R. (2024). The Relationship of Digital Literacy, Exposure to AI-Generated Deepfake Videos, and the Ability to Identify Deepfakes in Generation X. https://doi.org/10.56873/jpkm.v9i2.5873
Diel, A., Lalgi, T., Sam, F., Alexander, M., & Alexander, T. (2025). The harm of deepfakes: a scoping review of deepfakes’ negative effects on human mind and behavior. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02774-0
Li, W. (2024). “It’s Up to Me Whether I Do — Or Don’t — Watch Deepfakes”: Deepfakes and Behavioral Intention. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241302282
Lundberg, E., & Mozelius, P. (2025). The potential effects of deepfakes on news media and entertainment. AI & SOCIETY, 40(4), 2159-2170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02072-1
Nagara, M. A. (2025). Deepfake dan distorsi ruang publik digital: Analisis teori public sphere Jurgen Habermas. 03(01), 44-52.
Nurfauziyanti, F., Bahrudin, F. A., Sultan, U., Tirtayasa, A., & Kebangsaan, W. (2022). Pengaruh literasi digital terhadap perkembangan wawasan kebangsaan. 10(3), 54-66.
Rejekiningsih, T., Rasyid, M. Al, & Maret, U. S. (2025). Implikasi pengetahuan etika digital terhadap sikap anti-cyberbullying melalui pembelajaran kewarganegaraan digital pada mahasiswa. 36. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/integralistik
St-Onge, J., Harp, R., Lopez, G. S., Rogers, S. P., Haq, I. U., Hebert-Dufresne, L., & Onaolapo, J. (2024). Diverse misinformation: impacts of human biases on detection of deepfakes on networks. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44260-024-00006-y
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
Choi, M. (2016). A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the Internet age. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
Choi, M., Glassman, M., & Cristol, D. (2017). What it means to be a citizen in the Internet age: Development of a reliable and valid digital citizenship scale. Computers & Education, 107, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.002
McGrew, S. (2020). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education, 145, Article 103711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711
McGrew, S., & Breakstone, J. (2023). Civic online reasoning across the curriculum: Developing and testing the efficacy of digital literacy lessons. AERA Open, 9, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231176451
Pawelec, M. (2022). Deepfakes and democracy (theory): How synthetic audio-visual media for disinformation and hate speech threaten core democratic functions. Digital Society, 1, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00010-6
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence
